Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chun Hsin Tseng vs Calvin Hemery Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tseng vs Hemery analysis and find out who is favored!
Chun Hsin Tseng vs Calvin Hemery Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Tseng 1 - 0 Hemery
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tseng has won 50.55% of points on his second serve, while Hemery has won 50.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tseng, in recent form, has won 50.95% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hemery has won 47.3%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.16% and 31.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tseng has saved 62.16% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hemery has saved 60.21% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tseng has won 54.72% of matches played (W/L 29/ 24), with Hemery winning 59.21% (W/L 45/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tseng has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 98/ 63), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Hemery has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 184/ 121), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Tseng has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.35% of matches (W/L 25/ 21), where as Hemery has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 58.62% of matches (W/L 34/ 24). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tseng winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tseng winning 2 and Hemery winning 0. The last match between Tseng and Hemery was at the Maia 1 Challenger, 10-12-2021, Quarterfinals, Clay with Chun Hsin Tseng getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:54.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tseng and Hemery have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tseng winning 0 times and Hemery 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tseng winning 0, and Hemery 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tseng has played against opponents with an average rank of 353.91 while Hemery has played against players with an average rank of 270.78.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tseng has won 67% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hemery has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tseng has converted 41.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hemery has converted 37.28% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
253
Rank
83
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
214
Rank
116
High
29
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
59% (210-145)
Career Total W/L
58% (362-259)
57% (17-13)
YTD W/L
41% (12-17)
$180,215
Career Prize Money
$181,475
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Chun Hsin Tseng | Calvin Hemery |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:54 | 1:23:54 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (26/47) | 69% (36/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (17/26) | 56% (20/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (10/21) | 19% (3/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 50% (2/4) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (29/52) | 43% (20/47) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 |
Stats 
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Calvin Hemery
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
20 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
56
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chun Hsin Tseng | Calvin Hemery |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 57% (17/13) | 41% (12/17) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (35/35) | 44% (29/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (332/332) | 48% (312/334) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 69% (11/5) | 50% (11/11) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 20% (1/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.54 |
| Aces Total | 91 | 171 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 87 | 78 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:45 | 1:49:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 341.4 | 274.48 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (1169/2174) | 62% (1249/2024) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (812/1169) | 70% (871/1249) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (508/1005) | 51% (393/775) |
| BPs Won% Total | 42% (84/201) | 37% (63/169) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (825/2121) | 37% (761/2059) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 59% (17/12) | 48% (11/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (16/29) | 41% (11/27) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 38% (3/8) |
| Deciding Set W% | 82% (9/11) | 38% (3/8) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (12/12) | 79% (14/11) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (12/0) | 21% (14/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 28% (18/5) | 7% (15/1) |
Chun Hsin Tseng Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
45%
(
30 of
67)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
3
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Enrico Dalla Valle
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
63%
(
27 of
43)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
9 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Elias Ymer
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Quentin Halys
56%
(
72 of
129)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
33 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Tristan Lamasine
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Joao Domingues
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
45 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
71%
(
25 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Titouan Droguet
33%
(
4 of
12)
1st Serve %
52%
(
11 of
21)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
21
Total Points Won
12
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Calvin Hemery Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Duje Ajdukovic
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
47%
(
26 of
55)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
23 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martin Landaluce
Player
Calvin Hemery
61%
(
76 of
124)
1st Serve %
51%
(
56 of
110)
4
Aces
11
11
Double Faults
10
62%
(
47 of
76)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
42%
(
52 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
45 of
110)
117
Total Points Won
117
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karue Sell
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
36%
(
16 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Calvin Hemery
67%
(
56 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Joel Schwaerzler
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Henry Searle
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
27 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Calvin Hemery
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
9
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
27 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
76
|
3-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Alexander Ritschard
57%
(
76 of
133)
1st Serve %
66%
(
69 of
104)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
42 of
69)
46%
(
26 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
41%
(
54 of
133)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
122
Total Points Won
115
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Corentin Denolly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Patrick Kypson
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
9
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tseng Vs Hemery Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Chun Hsin Tseng
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
